Three-dimensional correction of scoliosis by a double spring reduction system as a dynamic internal brace: a pre-clinical study in Göttingen minipigs.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a major skeletal deformity that is characterized by a combination of apical rotation, lateral bending and apical lordosis. To provide full 3D correction, all these deformations should be addressed. We developed the Double Spring Reduction (DSR) system, a (growth-friendly) concept that continuously corrects the deformity through two different elements: A posterior convex Torsional Spring Implant (TSI) that provides a derotational torque at the apex, and a concave Spring Distraction System (SDS), which provides posterior, concave distraction to restore thoracic kyphosis. PURPOSE: To determine whether the DSR components are able to correct an induced idiopathic-like scoliosis and to compare correction realized by the TSI alone to correction enforced by the complete DSR implant. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Preclinical randomized animal cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Twelve growing Göttingen minipigs. OUTCOME MEASURES: Coronal Cobb angle, T10-L3 lordosis/kyphosis, apical axial rotation, relative anterior lengthening. METHODS: All mini-pigs received the TSI with a contralateral tether to induce an idiopathic-like scoliosis with apical rotation (mean Cobb: 20.4°; mean axial apical rotation: 13.1°, mean lordosis: 4.9°). After induction, the animals were divided into two groups: One group (N=6) was corrected by TSI only (TSI only-group), another group (N=6) was corrected by a combination of TSI and SDS (DSR-group). 3D spinal morphology on CT was compared between groups over time. After 2 months of correction, animals were euthanized. RESULTS: Both intervention groups showed excellent apical derotation (TSI only-group: 15.0° to 5.4°; DSR-group: 11.2° to 3.5°). The TSI only-group showed coronal Cobb improvement from 22.5° to 6.0°, while the DSR-group overcorrected the 18.3° Cobb to -9.2°. Lordosis was converted to kyphosis in both groups (TSI only-group: -4.6° to 4.3°; DSR-group: -5.2° to 25.0°) which was significantly larger in the DSR-group (p<.001). CONCLUSIONS: The TSI alone realized strong apical derotation and moderate correction in the coronal and sagittal plane. The addition of distraction on the posterior concavity resulted in more coronal correction and reversal of induced lordosis into physiological kyphosis. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This study shows that dynamic spring forces could be a viable method to guide the spine towards healthy alignment, without fusing it or inhibiting its growth.

Distraction forces on the spine in early-onset scoliosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and biomechanical literature.

Distraction-based growing rods are frequently used to treat Early-Onset Scoliosis. These use intermittent spinal distractions to maintain correction and allow for growth. It is unknown how much spinal distraction can be applied safely. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and biomechanical literature to identify such safety limits for the pediatric spine. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Three systematic searches were performed including in-vivo, ex-vivo and in-silico literature. Study quality was assessed in all studies and data including patient- or specimen characteristics, distraction magnitude and spinal failure location and ultimate force at failure were collected. Twelve studies were included, 6 in-vivo, 4 ex-vivo and 2 in-silico studies. Mean in-vivo distraction forces ranged between 242 and 621 N with maxima of 422-981 N, without structural failures when using pedicle screw constructs. In the ex-vivo studies (only cervical spines), segment C0-C2 was strongest, with decreasing strength in more distal segments. Meta-regression analysis demonstrated that ultimate force at birth is 300-350 N, which increases approximately 100 N each year until adulthood. Ex-vivo and in-silico studies showed that yielding occurs at 70-90% of ultimate force, failure starts at the junction between endplate and intervertebral disc, after which the posterior- and anterior long ligament rupture. While data on safety of distraction forces is limited, this systematic review and meta-analysis may aid in the development of guidelines on spinal distraction and may benefit the development and optimization of contemporary and future distraction-based technologies.

Induction of a representative idiopathic-like scoliosis in a porcine model using a multidirectional dynamic spring-based system.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Scoliosis is a 3D deformity of the spine in which vertebral rotation plays an important role. However, no treatment strategy currently exists that primarily applies a continuous rotational moment over a long period of time to the spine, while preserving its mobility. We developed a dynamic, torsional device that can be inserted with standard posterior instrumentation. The feasibility of this implant to rotate the spine and preserve motion was tested in growing mini-pigs. PURPOSE: To test the quality and feasibility of the torsional device to induce the typical axial rotation of scoliosis while maintaining growth and mobility of the spine. STUDY DESIGN: Preclinical animal study with 14 male, 7 month old Gottingen mini-pigs. Comparison of two scoliosis induction methods, with and without the torsional device, with respect to 3D deformity and maintenance of the scoliosis after removal of the implants. METHODS: Fourteen mini-pigs received either a unilateral tether-only (n=6) or a tether combined with a contralateral torsional device (n=8). X-rays and CT-scans were made post-operative, at 8 weeks and at 12 weeks. Flexibility of the spine was assessed at 12 weeks. In 3 mini-pigs per condition, the implants were removed and the animals were followed until no further correction was expected. RESULTS: At 12 weeks the tether-only group yielded a coronal Cobb angle of 16.8±3.3°For the tether combined with the torsional device this was 22.0±4.0°. The most prominent difference at 12 weeks was the axial rotation with 3.6±2.8° for the tether-only group compared to 18.1±4.6° for the tether-torsion group. Spinal growth and flexibility remained normal and comparable for both groups. After removal of the devices, the induced scoliosis reduced by 41% in both groups. There were no adverse tissue reactions, implant complications or infections. CONCLUSION: The present study indicates the ability of the torsional device combined with a tether to induce a flexible idiopathic-like scoliosis in mini-pigs. The torsional device was necessary to induce the typical axial rotation found in human scoliosis. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The investigated torsional device could induce apical rotation in a flexible and growing spine. Whether this may be used to reduce a scoliotic deformity remains to be investigated.

The potential of spring distraction to dynamically correct complex spinal deformities in the growing child.

PURPOSE: Current treatment of progressive early onset scoliosis involves growth-friendly instrumentation if conservative treatment fails. These implants guide growth by passive sliding or repeated lengthenings. None of these techniques provide dynamic correction after implantation. We developed the spring distraction system (SDS), by using one or multiple compressed springs positioned around a standard sliding rod, to provide active continuous distraction of the spine to stimulate growth and further correction. The purpose of this study was to determine feasibility and proof of concept of the SDS. METHODS: We developed a versatile, dynamic spring distraction system for patients who would benefit from active continuous distraction. This prospective case series evaluates four patients with exceptional and progressive congenital spine deformities. RESULTS: Four patients had a mean age of 6.8 years at surgery with a mean follow-up of 36 months (range 25-45). The mean progressive thoracic lordosis, which was the reason for initiating surgical treatment in two patients, changed from 32° lordosis preoperatively to 1° kyphosis post-operatively. During follow-up, this further improved to 32° thoracic kyphosis. In the two other patients, with cervicothorcacic scoliosis, the main coronal curve improved from 79° pre-operatively to 56° post-operatively and further improved to 42°. The mean T1-S1 spine growth during follow-up for all patients was 1.3 cm/year. There was one reoperation because of skin problems and no device-failures. CONCLUSION: These early results show the feasibility and the proof of concept of spring-based distraction as a dynamic growth-enhancing system with the potential of further correction of the deformity after implantation.

Spring distraction system for dynamic growth guidance of early onset scoliosis: two-year prospective follow-up of 24 patients.

BACKGROUND: Current surgical treatment options for early onset scoliosis (EOS), with distraction- or growth-guidance implants, show limited growth and high complication rates during follow-up. We developed a novel implant concept, which uses compressed helical springs positioned around the rods of a growth-guidance construct. This spring distraction system (SDS) provides continuous corrective force to stimulate spinal growth, can be easily contoured, and can be used with all standard spinal instrumentation systems. PURPOSE: To assess curve correction and -maintenance, spinal growth, complication rate, and health-related quality of life following SDS treatment. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: All skeletally immature EOS patients with an indication for growth-friendly surgery and without bone- or soft tissue weakness were eligible to receive SDS. For this study, all included patients with at least 2-year follow-up were analyzed. OUTCOME MEASURES: Coronal Cobb angle, sagittal parameters, T1-T12, T1-S1, and instrumented (ie, bridged segment) spinal height and freehand length, complications and re-operations, and the 24-Item Early Onset Scoliosis Questionnaires (EOSQ-24) score. METHODS: All primary- and conversion patients (conversion from failed other systems) with SDS and ≥2 years follow-up were included. Radiographic parameters were compared preoperatively, postoperatively and at latest follow-up. Spinal length increase was expressed as mm/year. RESULTS: Twenty-four skeletally immature EOS patients (18 primary and 6 conversion cases) were included. There were five idiopathic, seven congenital, three syndromic, and nine neuromuscular EOS patients. Mean age at implantation was 9.1 years (primary: 8.4; conversion: 11.2). Major curve improved from 60.3° to 35.3°, and was maintained at 40.6° at latest follow-up. Mean spring length increase during follow-up was 10.4 mm/year. T1-S1 height increased 9.9mm/year and the instrumented segment height showed a mean increase of 0.7 mm/segment/year. EOSQ-24 scores dropped after surgery from 75.6 to 67.4 but recovered to 75.0 at latest follow-up. In total, 17 reoperations were performed. Ten reoperations were performed to treat 9 implant-related complications. In addition, 7 patients showed spinal growth that exceeded expected growth velocity; their springs were retensioned during a small reoperation. CONCLUSION: The 2-year follow-up results from this prospective cohort study indicate that the concept of spring distraction may be feasible as an alternative to current growing spine solutions. Curve correction and growth could be maintained satisfactory without the need for repetitive lengthening procedures. However, as in all growth-friendly implants, complications and reoperations could not be prevented, which emphasizes the need for further improvement.

Spinal Growth in Patients With Juvenile Idiopathic Scoliosis Treated With Boston Brace: A Retrospective Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective comparative cohort. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether spinal growth is restricted by brace treatment in patients with juvenile idiopathic scoliosis (JIS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spinal fusion can negatively affect spinal growth if performed before the growth spurt. Brace treatment is often given in this young population to control the spinal deformity while allowing spinal growth. It is unknown whether the applied pressure of brace treatment on spine results in growth restriction. The aim of the study is to evaluate spinal growth in braced JIS patients. METHODS: A total of 49 JIS patients treated with Boston brace were retrospectively selected from a scoliosis database. T1-T12/T1-S1 perpendicular and freehand (height following the curvature of the spine) height were measured on radiographs of patients that had reached skeletal maturity and were matched with 49 controls without scoliosis. Spinal growth was calculated from brace initiation until cessation and was compared with normal spinal growth values as reported by Dimeglio. RESULTS: The mean age of diagnosis was 7.4 years. The age of the braced scoliosis patients at skeletal maturity was 17.5 years. The average T1-T12 and T1-S1 freehand height measured by following the curvature of the scoliosis was 29.3 cm (±2.4) and 47.2cm (±4.0), respectively, and was not significant different from the control group. Brace treatment was initiated at a mean age of 11.2 and the mean age of cessation was 14.8. Spinal growth (freehand) during brace treatment was 1.10 cm/year for the thoracic spine and 1.78 cm/year for the full spine and was not significant different from normal values. CONCLUSION: No significant influence of bracing on spinal growth could be detected in this cohort of JIS patients. The spinal height measurements at skeletal maturity were similar to matched controls. In addition, spinal growth did not significantly differ from Dimeglio normal growth data, indicating that the effect of bracing on spinal growth is absent or minimal. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

3-Year follow-up of a single magnetically controlled growing rod with contralateral gliding system and apical control for early onset scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Two-center retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical effectiveness and safety of the MCGR hybrid in terms of spinal growth, 3D correction, balance, and complications. The magnetic-controlled growing-rod (MCGR) growth instrumentation method has gained popularity for early onset scoliosis (EOS) treatment in the past years due to the non-invasiveness of the subsequent interval elongation procedures. To improve 3D correction and reduce the costs, we combined a single concave MCGR with a sliding rod on the convex side to control the apex. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 18 EOS children with an average 3-year follow-up (range 2.0-3.7) from two European spine centers treated with the single MCGR hybrid concept; 14 primary and 4 conversion cases. The primary and conversion cases were both evaluated preoperatively, postoperatively, 1 year, 2 years, and last follow-up. RESULTS: Mean age was 9.9 (SD ± 2.9 years). The average frontal Cobb angle was reduced from mean 65° to 30° postoperatively, and had increased to 37° at latest follow-up. Rotation of the apical vertebra improved from mean 27° to 20° postoperatively which was partially lost to 23°. Kyphosis and lordosis both increased by an average of 5° during the time of follow-up. Spinal balance was improved. The post-implantation T1-S1 spine growth rate averaged 10 mm/year at last follow-up. There were 13 implant-related complications in 6 out of 18 patients. No screw pull-outs and nor surgical site infections were registered. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first medium-term results of a single MCGR hybrid construct. Maintenance of correction and growth are reasonable, and the complication rate is relatively low as compared to bilateral MCGR application. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Reliability and Validity of the Adapted Dutch Version of the Early-Onset Scoliosis-24-Item Questionnaire (EOSQ-24).

STUDY DESIGN: Translation and validation of the Early Onset Scoliosis-24 Questionnaire (EOSQ-24). OBJECTIVE: To cross-culturally adapt the English version of the EOSQ-24 to the Dutch language and to assess the questionnaire's reliability and validity. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Early-onset scoliosis (EOS) has a profound impact on health-related quality of life. The EOSQ-24 is health-related quality of life questionnaire filled in by parents of children with EOS. The EOSQ-24 was already translated into multiple languages and its application was confirmed in clinical studies. However, the EOSQ-24 is not yet translated and validated for the Dutch population. METHODS: The adaption of the EOSQ-24 for the Dutch population was done in three steps: 1) translation to the Dutch language, 2) cross-cultural adaptation, and 3) cross-cultural validation. To ensure that the Adapted Dutch EOSQ-24 is applicable for clinical use, the measurement properties were tested in four steps: 1) floor and ceiling effects, 2) validation, 3) reliability, and 4) discriminative ability. One hundred three parents completed the Adapted Dutch EOSQ-24, the Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ-28 PF), and the Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire (SRS-22r). A second EOSQ-24 was completed for test-retest reproducibility. RESULTS: The EOSQ-24 was successfully translated, adapted, and validated for the Dutch language. Almost all response items showed a normal distribution. The EOSQ-24 showed excellent reliability (Cronbach α of 0.950). The EOSQ-24 was successfully validated against the CHQ-28-PF and the SRS-22r. Test-retest was excellent (ICC ≥ 0.8). Finally, The EOSQ-24 was found capable to discriminate patients with different curve severities (P = 0.003), diagnosis (P = 0.006), and ambulatory status (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The current Dutch EOSQ-24 proved to be a valid and reliable quality of life assessment tool for patients with EOS. Currently, long follow-up studies using the EOSQ-24, including the Dutch EOSQ-24, are lacking and are needed to fully validate the EOSQ-24 for use in a clinical setting. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

The efficacy of intrawound vancomycin powder and povidone-iodine irrigation to prevent surgical site infections in complex instrumented spine surgery.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are notorious complications in spinal surgery and cause substantial patient morbidity. Intraoperative decontamination of the wound with povidone-iodine irrigation or vancomycin powder has gained attention lately, but the efficacy of either intervention is unclear. PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of intrawound povidone-iodine or vancomycin in reducing the incidence of deep- and superficial SSIs in instrumented spinal surgery. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: A retrospective chart review was performed including all consecutive adult patients undergoing open, posterior, instrumented spinal surgery at any level between January 2012 and August 2017. OUTCOME MEASURES: The presence of SSI was evaluated according to the criteria published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The SSIs were divided into deep SSIs (below the muscular fascia) and superficial SSIs (above the muscular fascia). METHODS: A retrospective cohort without intrawound treatment was compared with two separate, consecutive intervention groups. One intrawound group received 1.3g/L povidone-iodine irrigation and the other received 1-2 grams of intrawound vancomycin powder at the end of surgery. Incidence of SSIs, as well as demographic, surgical and patient-related variables were registered and compared between groups. In patients with SSI, additional microbiological data were collected. RESULTS: In total, 853 patients were included. In the control group (N=257), 25 (9.7%) patients developed a deep and 13 (5.1%) developed a superficial SSI. In the povidone-iodine group (N=217), 21 (9.7%) patients developed a deep and two (0.9%) developed a superficial SSI. Compared with the control group, there was no significant difference in the incidence of deep SSIs (risk ratio [RR]: 1.00, 95% CI 0.57-1.73), although the number of superficial SSIs was reduced significantly (RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.04-0.80). In the vancomycin group (N=379), 19 (5.0%) patients developed a deep and six (1.6%) developed a superficial SSI. Both deep (RR: 0.52, 95% CI 0.29-0.92) and superficial SSIs (RR: 0.31, 95% CI 0.12-0.81) were significantly reduced in the vancomycin group compared with the control group, even when correcting for several risk factors associated with SSIs in a multivariable logistic regression analysis. There were no significant differences in complications between the 3 groups. No gram-negative selection or vancomycin-resistance was seen in the vancomycin group. CONCLUSIONS: Intrawound application of vancomycin was associated with a significant reduction in both deep and superficial SSIs in instrumented spinal surgery. A 1.3g/L intrawound povidone-iodine solution did not show a reduction in deep SSIs, although a reduction of superficial SSIs was observed.

Intrawound Treatment for Prevention of Surgical Site Infections in Instrumented Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Comparative Effectiveness Review and Meta-Analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of intrawound treatments in reducing deep surgical site infections (SSIs) in instrumented spinal surgery. METHODS: The electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane were systematically searched for intrawound treatments for the prevention of SSIs in clean instrumented spine surgery. Both randomized controlled trials and comparative cohort studies were included. The results of included studies were pooled for meta-analysis. RESULTS: After full text- and reference screening, 20 articles were included. There were 2 randomized controlled trials and 18 observational studies. Sixteen studies investigated the use of intrawound antibiotics, and 4 studies investigated the use of intrawound antiseptics. The relative risk of deep SSI for any treatment was 0.26 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.16-0.44, P < .0001), a significant reduction compared with controls receiving no treatment. For patients treated with local antibiotics the relative risk was 0.29 (95% CI 0.17-0.51, P < .0001), and patients treated with local antiseptics had a relative risk of 0.14 (95% CI 0.05-0.44, P = .0006). CONCLUSIONS: Both the use of antibiotic and antiseptic intrawound prophylactics was associated with a significant 3 to 7 times reduction of deep SSIs in instrumented spine surgery. No adverse events were reported in the included studies.

A comparison of growth among growth-friendly systems for scoliosis: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The optimal method for surgical treatment of early onset scoliosis is currently unknown. Although the aim of growth-friendly systems is to reduce the curve and maintain growth, there is no consensus on how to measure spinal growth during and after the treatment. Different measurements of different segments (T1-S1, T1-T12, instrumented length) are used for different time points to evaluate growth. The aim of this review is to assess what measurements are used and to compare the growth-friendly systems based on spinal growth during treatment. METHODS: The electronic MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched for original articles that reported growth for traditional growing rods (TGR), vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib expansion technique (VEPTR), Shilla, magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR), and Luque-trolley systems. All measurements were recorded, and weighted averages calculated in centimeter per year were compared. RESULTS: We included 52 studies (26 TGR, 12 MCGR, 6 VEPTR, 4 Luque trolley, 1 Shilla, and 3 mixed). Often only one segment was reported (T1-S1 length in 22 studies, T1-T12 length in two studies, and instrumented length in five studies). The remaining 22 studies reported T1-S1 length in combination with T1-T12 length (15 studies) or instrumented length (eight studies). Spinalgrowth achieved by initial correction only was a considerable 3.9 cm (based on 34 studies) as well as the spinal growth achieved by the final fusion surgery (2.3 cm in four studies). To specifically assess growth achieved with the system, length gain after initial surgery and before final fusion in growth system graduates was considered. Only four TGR studies reported on this "true" spinal growth with 0.6 and 0.3 cm/y in the T1-S1 and T1-T12 segment, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Reporting on spinal growth is currently inadequate and does not allow a good comparison of different techniques. However, all systems often report growth similar to Dimeglio's T1-S1 spinal growth of 1 cm/y. It should be recognized though that a considerable portion of the reported spinal growth is the result of the initial and final surgical correction and not due to the growth-friendly implant.

A reliability and validity study for different coronal angles using ultrasound imaging in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Radiation exposure remains a big concern in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Ultrasound imaging of the spine could significantly reduce or possibly even eliminate this radiation hazard. The spinous processes (SPs) and transverse processes (TPs) were used to measure the coronal deformity. Both landmarks provided reliable information on the severity of the curve as related to the traditional Cobb angle. However, it remained unclear which coronal ultrasound angle is the most appropriate method to measure the curve severity. PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to test the reliability and the validity of several ultrasound angle measurements in the coronal plane as compared with the radiographic coronal Cobb angle in patients with AIS. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This is a cross-sectional study. PATIENT SAMPLE: The study included 33 patients with AIS, both male and female (Cobb angle range: 3°-90°, primary and secondary curves), who underwent posterior-anterior radiography of the spine. OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome measures were the reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs] for the intra- and interobserver variabilities) and the validity (linear regression analysis and Bland-Altman method, including the mean absolute difference [MAD]) of different ultrasound measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patients were scanned using a dedicated ultrasound machine (Scolioscan, Telefield Medical Imaging Ltd, Hong Kong). The reliability and the validity were tested for three coronal ultrasound angles: an automatic and manual SP angle and a manual TP angle as compared with the radiographic coronal main thoracic or (thoraco)lumbar Cobb angles. RESULTS: The ICC showed very reliable measurements of all ultrasound methods (ICC ≥0.84). The ultrasound angles were 15%-37% smaller as compared with the Cobb angles; however, excellent linear correlations were seen between all ultrasound angles and the Cobb angle (thoracic: R2≥0.987 and (thoraco)lumbar R2≥0.970), and the Bland-Altman plot showed a good agreement between all ultrasound angles and the Cobb angle. The MADs of the ultrasound angles, corrected using the linear regression equation, and the Cobb angles showed no significant difference between the different ultrasound angles (MAD: automatic SP angle 4.9°±3.2°, manual SP angle 4.5°±3.1°, and manual TP angle 4.7°±3.6°; p≥.388). CONCLUSIONS: Coronal ultrasound angles are based on different landmarks than the traditional Cobb angle measurement and cannot represent the same angle values. In this study, we found excellent correlations between the ultrasound and Cobb measurements, without differences in the reliability and validity between the ultrasound angles based on the SPs and TPs. Therefore, the severity of the deformity in patients with AIS can be assessed by ultrasound imaging, avoiding hazardous ionizing radiation and enabling more individualized patient care. It also opens possibilities for screening.

Treatment of early-onset scoliosis with a hybrid of a concave magnetic driver (magnetic controlled growth rod) and a contralateral passive sliding rod construct with apical control: preliminary report on 17 cases.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Magnetic controlled growth rods (MCGRs) are increasingly popular for surgical treatment of severe early-onset scoliosis (EOS), because they allow noninvasive extensions with good growth maintenance. We combined an MCGR with a contralateral passive sliding rod construct with apical control on the convex side to improve efficiency in terms of costs and three-dimensional (3D) correction. PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility, 3D correction, spinal growth, and complications of the apical control MCGR sliding rod hybrid. STUDY DESIGN: Two-center retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: A consecutive series of 17 children with EOS from two European spine centers were treated with the hybrid principle: 13 primary cases and 4 conversion cases from other growth instrumentation. Median age at surgery was 9 years (range: 6-18). Median follow-up time was 24 months (range: 12-31). OUTCOMES: Cobb angles (frontal Cobb, kyphosis, lordosis), rotation, spinal length gain, growth rate, and complications. METHODS: Radiographs and patient files were reviewed. All the patients received fully financed treatment within the national public health-care systems. RESULTS: Mean preoperative frontal Cobb angle was 59°, reduced postoperatively to 30° and was maintained throughout follow-up. Mean rotation of the apical vertebra improved from 27° to 18°, but was partially lost over time. Kyphosis decreased and lordosis was largely unaltered. Instrumented spine growth was maintained at a mean of 12 mm per year. One child had surgical revision because of progressive trunk shift, unrelated to the technique. The same child fell and sustained T1 and T2 fractures that were treated conservatively. Another child is planned for revision because of MCGR distraction failure. CONCLUSION: These early results show satisfactory frontal Cobb curve reduction and maintenance of spinal growth after using a new hybrid concept of a single magnetic growth rod and contralateral apical control sliding rods. A single magnetic growth rod in this combination may work equally well as traditional or dual magnetic growth rods. This new concept may represent a significant gain in both cost-effectiveness of growth rod treatment and 3D correction in EOS.